Module VI·Article III·~2 min read
Alternative Goals of the Firm
Profit and Firm Behavior
Turn this article into a podcast
Pick voices, format, length — AI generates the audio
Alternative Goals of the Firm
The standard model assumes profit maximization. However, real firms may pursue other goals as well. Understanding alternative goals is important for analyzing corporate behavior.
Critique of Profit Maximization
Separation of Ownership and Control:
In large corporations, shareholders are the owners, while managers are the executives.
Interests may diverge — Principal-agent problem.
Bounded Rationality:
Managers do not know the exact cost or demand curves.
They use rules and heuristics – “good enough” instead of optimum.
Multiplicity of Stakeholders:
Not only shareholders, but also employees, clients, society.
ESG and sustainable development.
Revenue Maximization (Sales Maximization)
Baumol’s Model:
Managers maximize revenue subject to a minimum profit constraint.
Why revenue?
- Manager salaries and status correlate with size
- Market share — indicator of success
- Company growth — career opportunities
Consequences:
- Output is higher than under profit maximization
- Price is lower
- Profit is not maximized, but “sufficient”
Growth Maximization
Marris’s Model:
The firm maximizes the rate of growth constrained by share price.
Growth requires:
- Reinvesting profits (less dividends)
- Capturing markets, diversification
- M&A activity
Conflict: short-term profit vs. long-term growth.
Investments today reduce profits but create future value.
Managerial Theories
Williamson’s Model:
Managers maximize their own utility—a function of:
- Staff size
- Expense preferences
- Discretionary investments
Consequences:
- Bloated staff
- Expensive offices, corporate jets
- “Empire building”
Satisficing
Simon’s Model:
Instead of maximization—achieving a “satisfactory” level.
Why?
- Optimum search is too expensive
- Information is incomplete
- Cognitive limitations
The firm sets:
- Target level of profit, sales, market share
If reached — does not seek improvements.
If not reached — seeks changes.
Behavioral Theory of the Firm
Cyert & March: The firm is a coalition of groups with different interests.
Groups: shareholders, managers, employees, suppliers, customers.
Process:
- Negotiations, compromises
- Goals are formed in the process, not set externally
- “Organizational slack” — reserves for satisfying all
Corporate Governance and Alignment of Interests
Mechanisms for aligning the interests of managers and shareholders:
-
Compensation:
- Stock options, profit-based bonuses
- Link manager wealth to performance
-
Board of Directors:
- Supervision of management
- Independent directors
-
Market for Corporate Control:
- Threat of takeover disciplines management
- Inefficient companies become takeover targets
-
Managerial Labor Market:
- Manager reputation depends on results
- Incentive to show good performance
For the investor
-
Agency costs:
- Divergence between managers’ and shareholders’ interests
- Empire building, excessive perks, risk aversion
- Need to analyze corporate governance
-
Incentive structures:
- How is management compensated?
- Options may create risk-taking
- Bonuses from short-term profit — short-termism
-
Investor activism:
- Activist hedge funds demand changes
- Pressure on capital return, efficiency
Understanding the real goals of the firm helps to predict its behavior better than the simple profit-maximization model.
§ Act · what next