Module VII·Article I·~2 min read
National Myth: How Images of Peoples Are Created
Political Myths and the Mythology of the Masses
Turn this article into a podcast
Pick voices, format, length — AI generates the audio
Nations as Imagined Communities
Benedict Anderson showed that nations are imagined communities. But imagined does not mean unreal. The most real thing is that people are willing to die for it. And in the name of the national myth, millions died in the twentieth century.
The national myth is a narrative about origins, a golden age, decline, and possible rebirth. It always contains a component of “chosenness”: our people are special, they have a special mission. This connects nationalism to religious messianic narratives.
The “golden age” is almost obligatory. The Russian myth: Ancient Rus, Orthodoxy, a special path. The French myth: The Great Revolution, the Enlightenment, a universal mission. The American myth: “A city upon a hill”, “Manifest Destiny”, exceptionalism. The German myth: The Third Reich as an attempt to restore imagined German greatness. The consequences are well-known.
The Political Mythology of Totalitarianism
Totalitarian regimes are myth-making machines. The Soviet narrative: capitalist enemies, the party as the vanguard of the proletariat, building the new man, the bright communist future. The Nazi narrative: Aryan race, Jewish conspiracy, the thousand-year Reich, Lebensraum.
Georges Sorel, in “Reflections on Violence” (1908), understood earlier than others: political myths work not through logic, but through emotion and mobilization. The “general strike” is a myth that mobilizes workers regardless of whether it ever actually occurs. This anticipated the analysis of propaganda in the twentieth century.
Media and Mythologization
Modern media are myth-making machines. The news cycle creates “villains” (terrorism, pandemic, enemies of the state) and “heroes” (national leaders, victims, saviors). This is not always conscious manipulation: the media follow archetypal structures because the audience expects them.
A political leader in the media is inevitably mythologized: his past is rewritten as the narrative of a “hero’s journey”, his words are quoted as prophecies, his mistakes are explained by the betrayal of internal enemies. This happens regardless of ideology — Lenin, Churchill, Mao, Kennedy, Putin all undergo the same mythologization.
Question for reflection: Which elements of your country’s “national myth” do you consider strong (mobilizing, unifying), and which problematic (distorting history, excluding minorities)?
§ Act · what next