Module I·Article IX·~3 min read
Investment Policy Statement (IPS)
Portfolio Thinking and Governance Framework
Turn this article into a podcast
Pick voices, format, length — AI generates the audio
Investment Policy Statement IPS (Investment Policy Statement) — the “Constitution” for an investor, a document that defines all key parameters of capital management. This is not just a formality — an IPS protects both the investor and the manager, creating clear boundaries for decision-making.
Why is an IPS needed?
- Discipline — prevents emotional decisions during moments of panic or euphoria
- Clarity of expectations — both investor and manager equally understand the goals
- Legal protection — document of fiduciary duty
- Continuity — a new CIO understands how to manage the portfolio
- Regulatory compliance — requirement of DFSA, SEC, FCA for institutional investors
Structure of the IPS: full breakdown
| Section | Content | Example wording |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Investment Objectives | Target return, investment horizon, purpose of funds | “Achievement of a real return of 4% per annum over a 10+ year horizon to finance pension obligations” |
| 2. Risk Tolerance | Maximum drawdown, VaR limits, volatility | “Maximum drawdown not to exceed 15% over any 12-month period. VaR(95%) not more than 2% daily NAV” |
| 3. Constraints | Prohibited assets, liquidity, ESG, tax restrictions | “Prohibited: tobacco, weapons, gambling. Minimum 20% of portfolio in assets with T+1 liquidity” |
| 4. SAA (Strategic Asset Allocation) | Target weights of asset classes with allowed ranges | “DM equities: 35% (30–40%), IG bonds: 25% (20–30%), Alternatives: 10% (5–15%)” |
| 5. Rebalancing | Triggers, procedure, frequency | “Rebalancing when asset class deviates by ±5% from target weight or quarterly” |
| 6. Benchmark | Index for performance evaluation | “60% MSCI World + 40% Bloomberg Global Aggregate” |
| 7. Governance | Roles, decision-making processes, reporting | “IC meets monthly. Quarterly report for Board of Trustees” |
Example of a real IPS for a family office ($50 million)
- Objective: Preservation of capital’s purchasing power with moderate growth.
- Target real return: 3–4% per annum after inflation and fees.
- Horizon: Perpetual (multi-generational wealth)
- Risk:
- Maximum drawdown: 20% (absolute)
- Portfolio volatility: 8–12% per annum
- VaR(99%, 1 day): 2.5% NAV
- Constraints:
- Minimum 15% in liquid assets (T+1)
- Maximum 20% in a single issuer (except for government bonds)
- ESG: exclusion of companies with ESG rating below BBB (MSCI)
- Leverage: maximum 1.2x gross exposure
When to review the IPS?
| Trigger | Action |
|---|---|
| Scheduled review | Annually or every 3 years (depending on investor type) |
| Change in circumstances | Change of horizon, major withdrawal/contribution, changes in legislation |
| Structural market changes | New asset classes, changes in correlations |
| Change of CIO | Review within 90 days |
Critically important rule
IPS does NOT change in response to short-term market movements!
When the market falls by 30%, there is a temptation to “temporarily” reduce equity exposure. This is a mistake — the IPS exists precisely to protect against such decisions.
The exception is if the investor’s fundamental circumstances have changed (horizon, liquidity needs).
Typical mistakes in an IPS
- Ranges too broad — “Equities 20–80%” gives no discipline
- Unrealistic objectives — “10% per annum with 5% volatility” is impossible
- Absence of a rebalancing procedure — without this, SAA is meaningless
- Ignoring liquidity — illiquid assets cannot be sold in a crisis
- No benchmark — impossible to assess the quality of management
§ Act · what next