Module XXIII·Article III·~5 min read
Term Sheets and Cap Tables
Venture Capital
Turn this article into a podcast
Pick voices, format, length — AI generates the audio
Term Sheets: Anatomy of a Venture Deal
Term Sheet — a non-binding document (usually) that records the key terms of the investment. This is a "preliminary agreement" on the basis of which lawyers prepare the final documents (Stock Purchase Agreement, Investor Rights Agreement, Voting Agreement).
Key Economic Terms
- Valuation
| Term | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Money Valuation | Company valuation BEFORE the investment | $20M |
| Post-Money Valuation | Pre-money + Investment amount | $20M + $5M = $25M |
| Price Per Share | Post-money / Fully diluted shares | $25M / 10M shares = $2.50 |
Important: Founders often focus on pre-money, investors — on ownership %. With $20M pre / $5M investment, the investor gets 20% ($5M / $25M).
- Liquidation Preference
Liquidation Preference — the investor’s prior right to capital return upon exit (sale, liquidation).
| Type | Description | Example (with $50M exit, $5M invested, 20% ownership) |
|---|---|---|
| 1x Non-Participating | Investor chooses: return $5M OR receive 20% of exit | Chooses 20% = $10M (better than $5M) |
| 1x Participating | First $5M, THEN 20% of remainder | $5M + 20% × $45M = $5M + $9M = $14M |
| 2x Non-Participating | Return $10M OR 20% | Chooses 20% = $10M (equal) |
| 2x Participating | $10M + 20% of remainder | $10M + 20% × $40M = $18M |
Participating vs Non-Participating Preferred
Non-participating (standard): Investor converts to common for a large exit — founder-friendly
Participating: "Double-dip" — receives both preference and participation — investor-friendly
Capped participating: Participation up to a certain cap (for example, 3x)
- Anti-Dilution Protection
Investor protection in a down round (subsequent round at a lower valuation):
| Type | Mechanism | Founder Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Full Ratchet | Price is reset to new (lower) price | Highly dilutive, rarely used |
| Weighted Average (Broad-based) | Weighted average recalculation considering size of down round | Standard, moderate impact |
| Weighted Average (Narrow-based) | Weighted average, but only preferred in the base | More dilutive than broad-based |
Broad-Based Weighted Average Formula
$ NCP = OCP \times \frac{CS + NM}{CS + NS} $
Where:
- $NCP$ = New Conversion Price
- $OCP$ = Old Conversion Price
- $CS$ = Common Stock Outstanding
- $NM$ = New Money / OCP (shares if priced at old price)
- $NS$ = New Shares Actually Issued
Governance and Control Rights
- Board Composition
| Stage | Typical Board | Investor Seats |
|---|---|---|
| Seed | 3 members | 0-1 (often observer) |
| Series A | 5 members | 1-2 |
| Series B+ | 5-7 members | 2-3 |
- Protective Provisions (Veto Rights)
Investors require approval for key decisions:
- Amendment of charter / bylaws
- Issuance of new shares (especially with senior rights)
- Sale of company / material assets
- Change in Board size
- Declaration of dividends
- Increase in option pool
- Significant debt obligations
- Pro-Rata Rights
Right to participate in future rounds to maintain ownership %.
- Major Investors: Usually determined by size of position ($500K+)
- Super Pro-Rata: Right to increase position (rare)
- Pay-to-Play: Lose rights if not participating (investor-friendly)
Option Pool and Dilution
Option Pool Basics
Option Pool — a reserve of shares for employees (ESOP). Created before the investment, diluting founders.
| Stage | Typical Pool Size | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Seed | 10-15% | Early key hires |
| Seed | 10-15% | Team expansion |
| Series A | 10-15% refresh | VP-level hires, team scaling |
| Series B+ | 5-10% refresh | Executive hires, retention |
Option Pool Shuffle
Investors insist on pool creation from pre-money, which dilutes founders disproportionately:
Example: $20M pre-money, $5M investment, 15% option pool
- Without pool: Founders have 80% post-money
- With pool from pre-money: Founders have 68% (80% × 85%)
Investor: 20% ownership undiluted
Cap Table: Structure and Evolution
Simple Cap Table (Post-Seed)
| Shareholder | Shares | % | Value @ $10M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Founder A | 4,000,000 | 40% | $4M |
| Founder B | 3,000,000 | 30% | $3M |
| Seed Investor | 1,500,000 | 15% | $1.5M |
| Option Pool | 1,500,000 | 15% | $1.5M |
| Total | 10,000,000 | 100% | $10M |
Cap Table Evolution (Post-Series A)
| Shareholder | Shares | % | Value @ $30M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Founder A | 4,000,000 | 28.6% | $8.6M |
| Founder B | 3,000,000 | 21.4% | $6.4M |
| Seed Investor | 1,500,000 | 10.7% | $3.2M |
| Series A Investor | 3,000,000 | 21.4% | $6.4M |
| Option Pool (expanded) | 2,500,000 | 17.9% | $5.4M |
| Total | 14,000,000 | 100% | $30M |
Founder-Friendly vs Investor-Friendly Terms
| Term | Founder-Friendly | Investor-Friendly |
|---|---|---|
| Liquidation Preference | 1x Non-participating | 2x+ Participating |
| Anti-dilution | Broad-based weighted average | Full ratchet |
| Board | Founder control (2:1:1) | Investor majority or veto |
| Option Pool | Post-money or smaller size | Large pool from pre-money |
| Vesting | Single-trigger acceleration | Double-trigger or no acceleration |
| Protective Provisions | Limited, standard | Extensive, operational |
| Dividends | None | Cumulative dividends |
| Redemption | None | Mandatory redemption after 5-7 years |
Negotiation Dynamics
Leverage is determined by:
- Company momentum: Hot deal = founder leverage
- Market conditions: Bull market = founder-friendly terms
- Alternatives: Multiple term sheets = negotiating power
- Stage: Later stage = more standardized terms
- Investor reputation: Top-tier VC may get worse terms for brand
Red Flags in Term Sheets
- Participating preferred with no cap
- Full ratchet anti-dilution
- Excessive protective provisions
- Unusual liquidation multiples (3x+)
- Founder vesting reset
- Pay-to-play provisions (for founders)
- Redemption rights
- Unusual board control provisions
Recommendations for Understanding Deals
- Valuation is not everything: Bad terms on a high valuation = poor outcome
- Model scenarios: Calculate waterfall at different exit values
- Understand stacking: Multiple rounds preferences stack against founders
- Cap table hygiene: Clean cap table is important for subsequent rounds
- Legal review essential: Nuances in documents matter enormously
§ Act · what next