Module V·Article III·~5 min read
OFZ Market and Historical EM Crises
EM Debt and OFZ
Turn this article into a podcast
Pick voices, format, length — AI generates the audio
OFZ Market, Turkey, and Historical EM Crises
Each Emerging Market (EM) has unique characteristics, risks, and opportunities. The study of historical crises is critically important for understanding the nature of EM risks and building a resilient portfolio.
Russia: OFZ — A Lesson in Geopolitical Risk
OFZ (Federal Loan Bonds) were one of the most popular EM local currency instruments until the 2022 sanctions. The history of the OFZ market demonstrates the evolution of risks.
Evolution of the OFZ Market
| Period | Characteristic | Yield | Foreign investors |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993-1998 | GKO, high yield, default | 50-150% | ~30% (before crisis) |
| 1999-2007 | Recovery, commodity boom | 6-12% | ~5% |
| 2008-2013 | Post-GFC, inclusion in indices | 7-10% | ~25% |
| 2014-2021 | Crimea sanctions, RUB volatility | 6-9% | ~20% |
| 2022+ | Full isolation, sanctions | 10-15% (domestic) | ~0% (frozen) |
1998 Crisis: A Detailed Analysis
| Factor | Description |
|---|---|
| Causes | Oil drop to $10, fiscal deficit 8% GDP, currency peg, short-term debt |
| Trigger | Asian crisis 1997, capital outflow |
| Consequences | RUB devaluation by 75%, GKO default, banking crisis |
| Investor losses | GKO: -70% in USD; Eurobonds: recovery ~30% |
| Lesson | Currency mismatch + short-term debt = disaster recipe |
2014-2015 Crisis: Sanctions and Oil
| Factor | Description |
|---|---|
| Causes | Crimea sanctions, oil drop from $110 to $30 |
| Consequences | RUB -50%, CB rate up to 17%, inflation 15% |
| OFZ performance | -15% in RUB, -50% in USD |
| Lesson | Commodity dependence + geopolitics = double hit |
2022: Complete Isolation
Uniqueness of the situation:
Largest EM market became fully inaccessible overnight
Foreign assets ~$40 billion frozen
Rating: Investment Grade → Default in 2 weeks
Precedent for assessment of geopolitical risk premium
Turkey 2018: A Classic EM Crisis
The Turkish crisis of 2018 is a textbook example of how political intervention in monetary policy leads to a currency collapse.
Chronology of the Crisis
| Date | Event | USD/TRY | 10Y yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| January 2018 | Start of pressure on CB | 3.80 | 11% |
| May 2018 | Erdogan: "enemy of interest rates" | 4.50 | 14% |
| August 2018 | US sanctions, crisis peak | 7.20 | 21% |
| September 2018 | CB raises rate to 24% | 6.00 | 18% |
| 2019-2021 | Chronic depreciation | 8-15 | 15-20% |
| 2022-2023 | "New model", inflation 80% | 18-30 | 25-45% |
Key Factors of the Crisis
- Political pressure on CB: Erdogan believed high rates were the cause of inflation (not the consequence)
- External debt: $450 billion, significant portion in USD for corporates
- Current account deficit: -6% of GDP, dependence on external financing
- Inflationary spiral: Depreciation → imported inflation → further depreciation
- Loss of credibility: Investors lost faith in the CB
Investor Losses
| Asset | Losses 2018 | Losses 2018-2023 |
|---|---|---|
| TRY local bonds | -40% in USD | -70% in USD |
| Turkey USD bonds | -15% | -25% |
| Turkish equities | -50% in USD | -60% in USD |
Argentina: Serial Defaulter
Argentina holds the record for number of defaults (9 times since 1827). Studying Argentinian crises is mandatory for an EM investor.
Default of 2001: Collapse of the Currency Board
| Element | Description |
|---|---|
| Prerequisites | Currency board (1 ARS = 1 USD) since 1991, debt buildup |
| Problem | USD appreciated → Argentina lost competitiveness |
| Crisis | Bank panic, corralito (deposit freeze) |
| Default | $100 billion — largest in history at the time |
| Devaluation | 1:1 → 4:1 (75% depreciation) |
| Recovery | ~30 cents on the dollar after lengthy negotiations |
2018 Crisis: "Sudden Stop"
| Month | USD/ARS | Event |
|---|---|---|
| April 2018 | 20 | Start of sell-off, taper tantrum 2.0 |
| May 2018 | 25 | CB raises rate to 40% |
| June 2018 | 28 | IMF agreement for $50 billion |
| August 2018 | 40 | Second wave of panic |
| 2019 | 60 | Capital controls, Macri loses |
| 2020 | 80 | Ninth default |
GCC: Quality EM Segment
Persian Gulf countries are a special EM segment with characteristics approaching developed markets (DM).
Comparative Table of GCC Sovereigns
| Country | Rating | Debt/GDP | USD Peg | Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UAE (Abu Dhabi) | AA | ~0% | Yes | Highest EM rating, SWF $900B+ |
| Qatar | AA- | ~55% | Yes | LNG, diversification, 2022 WC |
| Kuwait | A+ | ~10% | Basket | Largest SWF per capita |
| Saudi Arabia | A | ~25% | Yes | Vision 2030, largest issuer |
| Oman | BB+ | ~65% | Yes | Weaker peers, reforms |
| Bahrain | B+ | ~130% | Yes | High debt, GCC support |
Advantages of GCC for CIO
- USD peg: No currency risk
- High ratings: AA-A segment is rare in EM
- Low correlation: With other EMs (oil-specific drivers)
- Sukuk: Access to Islamic finance segment
- Liquidity: Benchmark issues are well-traded
Systematization of Lessons from EM Crises
| Lesson | Examples | Early Warning Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| Currency pegs are fragile | Argentina 2001, Russia 1998, Asia 1997 | Overvalued REER, reserve depletion |
| Short-term debt kills | Mexico 1994, Asia 1997 | High ST debt/reserves ratio |
| Policy credibility matters | Turkey 2018-2023 | Real rates negative, CB independence |
| Current account matters | Turkey, Argentina, SA | CAD > 4% GDP = warning |
| Geopolitics is underpriced | Russia 2022 | Hard to predict, monitor tensions |
| Commodity dependence | Russia, Brazil, SA | Terms of trade volatility |
EM Vulnerability Indicators (Early Warning System)
| Indicator | Threshold | Country Examples (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Current Account / GDP | > -4% = risk | Turkey -5%, Colombia -4% |
| ST Debt / Reserves | > 100% = high risk | Turkey 180%, Argentina 200% |
| Reserves / Imports | < 3 months = risk | Pakistan, Egypt |
| Real Interest Rate | < 0% = risk | Turkey -30%, Argentina -50% |
| External Debt / GDP | > 60% = elevated | Ukraine, Hungary |
| Budget Deficit / GDP | > 5% = concern | Brazil -7%, SA -6% |
Practical CIO Checklist Before Investing in an EM Country
✓ Macro fundamentals: CA, reserves, debt sustainability
✓ Policy framework: CB independence, fiscal discipline
✓ Political calendar: Elections, power transition
✓ Geopolitical risks: Sanctions, conflicts, relations with US/EU/China
✓ Market structure: Liquidity, capital controls, settlement
✓ Valuation: Spread vs history, vs peers
✓ Positioning: Crowded trades?
✓ Correlation: With rest of portfolio
✓ Exit strategy: How to exit under stress?
§ Act · what next