Ordinary people will deliver lethal electric shocks if an authority tells them to.

Verdict: mixed

Mixed

High obedience is real and has been partly replicated, but the shocks were fake and interpretations are debated.

What the evidence shows

Milgram (1963) found that a majority of ordinary volunteers, prodded by an experimenter, went on pressing what they believed were increasingly dangerous shock switches against a screaming 'learner.' The result is one of psychology's most cited, taken as evidence of how far obedience can override conscience.

The core phenomenon holds up: Burger (2009), running an ethically constrained version, found obedience rates similar to Milgram's up to the study's cut-off point. But interpretation is contested. Re-analyses of Milgram's archives show many participants doubted the shocks were real, obedience varied a lot across his conditions, and 'engaged followership' (belief in the scientific cause) may matter more than blind submission. So: obedience to authority is genuinely powerful, but the simple 'anyone will kill on command' reading oversimplifies what the data show.

Sources

  1. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience.

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378

    65% of participants administered the maximum (fake) shock level when instructed by the experimenter.

    DOI: 10.1037/h0040525
  2. Burger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today?.

    American Psychologist, 64(1), 1–11

    A modern, ethically limited replication found obedience rates comparable to Milgram's up to the 150-volt cut-off.

    DOI: 10.1037/a0010932